International Business Machines vs Northrop Grumman
Side-by-side earnings signal comparison from SEC quarterly filings
Verdict
International Business Machines (IBM) carries a "Mixed" signal with +6.3% revenue growth, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) is "Neutral" with -1.2% revenue growth. Both companies report in the Technology and Industrials sectors.
| Metric | International Business Machines (IBM) | Northrop Grumman (NOC) |
|---|---|---|
| Operator Signal | Mixed | Neutral |
| Signal Confidence | HIGH | HIGH |
| Latest Revenue | $15.9B | $9.9B |
| Revenue Growth | 6.3%* | -1.2% |
| Latest EPS | $1.28 | $6.14* |
| EPS Growth | N/A | -12.3% |
| Sector | Technology | Industrials |
| Quarters Tracked | 8 | 8 |
International Business Machines (IBM) carries a "Mixed" signal with +6.3% revenue growth, while Northrop Grumman (NOC) is "Neutral" with -1.2% revenue growth. Both companies report in the Technology and Industrials sectors.
Explore More
Related Comparisons
Technology peer
Technology peer
Technology peer
Technology peer
Industrials peer
Industrials peer
Industrials peer
Industrials peer
The side-by-side above pulls the SEC EDGAR 8-K filings data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: SEC EDGAR 10-K filings, 2026.