International Business Machines vs ConocoPhillips
Side-by-side earnings signal comparison from SEC quarterly filings
Verdict
International Business Machines (IBM) carries a "Mixed" signal with +6.3% revenue growth, while ConocoPhillips (COP) is "Neutral" with +20.9% revenue growth. Both companies report in the Technology and Energy sectors.
| Metric | International Business Machines (IBM) | ConocoPhillips (COP) |
|---|---|---|
| Operator Signal | Mixed | Neutral |
| Signal Confidence | HIGH | HIGH |
| Latest Revenue | $15.9B | $15.8B |
| Revenue Growth | 6.3% | 20.9%* |
| Latest EPS | $1.28 | $1.78* |
| EPS Growth | N/A | 1.1% |
| Sector | Technology | Energy |
| Quarters Tracked | 8 | 8 |
International Business Machines (IBM) carries a "Mixed" signal with +6.3% revenue growth, while ConocoPhillips (COP) is "Neutral" with +20.9% revenue growth. Both companies report in the Technology and Energy sectors.
Explore More
The side-by-side above pulls the SEC EDGAR 8-K filings data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: SEC EDGAR 10-K filings, 2026.